Home
GSC Advanced Research and Reviews
Peer-reviewed | Multidisciplinary Journal | Impact factor 8.3 | ISSN: 2582-4597 | Crossref DOI

Main navigation

  • Home
    • Journal Information
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Reviewer Panel
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Journal Policies
    • Our CrossMark Policy
    • Publication Ethics
    • Issue in Progress
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Article processing fee
    • Track Manuscript Status
    • Get Publication Certificate
    • Join Editorial Board
    • Join Reviewer Panel
  • Contact us
  • Downloads

Audit of compliance with Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis guidelines across medical and non-medical wards in a tertiary care hospital

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • Audit of Compliance With Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prophylaxis Guidelines Across Medical and Non-medical Wards In a Tertiary Care Hospital
  • Audit of compliance with Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis guidelines across medical and non-medical wards in a tertiary care hospital

Mohamed Mirghani Ibrahim Eltayeb 1, Mohamed emadeldin mohamedali ahmed 1, Ali Mohammed El Haj Izzeldin Ishag 2, Mohammedalmojtaba Abdelrahman 3 and Osman Elshafee Osman Elkhalifa 4, *

1 Sudan medical specialization board, University of science and technology, khartoum, Sudan.
2 Sudan medical specialization board, University of Bahri, Bahri, Sudan.
3 Sudan medical specialization board, Red sea university, Portsudan, Sudan.
4 Sudan medical specialization board, Omdurman Islamic university, Omdurman, Sudan.

Research Article

GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 2026, 27(01), 150–152

Article DOI: 10.30574/gscarr.2026.27.1.0093

DOI url: https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2026.27.1.0093

Received on 11 March 2026; revised on 19 April 2026; accepted on 22 April 2026

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is a significant and potentially preventable cause of morbidity and mortality among hospitalized patients. Evidence-based guidelines recommend routine risk assessment and appropriate thromboprophylaxis for all admitted patients unless contraindicated. Despite clear recommendations, adherence to these guidelines varies across clinical settings.
Aim: This audit aimed to assess compliance with VTE prophylaxis guidelines across medical and non-medical inpatient wards in a tertiary care hospital.
Methods: A retrospective clinical audit was conducted including 100 patients admitted to medical, surgical, and obstetrics and gynecology wards. Data were collected on VTE risk assessment and appropriateness of prophylaxis. Compliance was evaluated against hospital policy aligned with NICE guidelines.
Results: Compliance with VTE prophylaxis guidelines was higher in medical wards (95%) compared to non-medical wards (75%), demonstrating significant variability between specialties.
Conclusion: While compliance was generally high in medical wards, lower adherence in non-medical wards highlights the need for targeted interventions to improve patient safety.

Venous thromboembolism; Thromboprophylaxis; Clinical audit; NICE guidelines; Patient safety

https://gscarr.gsconlinepress.com/sites/default/files/fulltext_pdf/GSCARR-2026-…

Preview Article PDF

Mohamed Mirghani Ibrahim Eltayeb, Mohamed emadeldin mohamedali ahmed, Ali Mohammed El Haj Izzeldin Ishag, Mohammedalmojtaba Abdelrahman and Osman Elshafee Osman Elkhalifa. Audit of compliance with Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis guidelines across medical and non-medical wards in a tertiary care hospital. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 2026, 27(01), 150–152. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2026.27.1.0093.

Copyright © Author(s). All rights reserved. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.


All statements, opinions, and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s). The journal, editors, reviewers, and publisher disclaim any responsibility or liability for the content, including accuracy, completeness, or any consequences arising from its use.

Get Certificates

Get Publication Certificate

Download LoA

Check Corssref DOI details

Issue details

Issue Cover Page

Editorial Board

Table of content

Copyright © 2026 GSC Advanced Research and Reviews - All rights reserved

Developed & Designed by VS Infosolution