Home
GSC Advanced Research and Reviews
Peer-reviewed | Multidisciplinary Journal | Impact factor 8.3 | ISSN: 2582-4597 | Crossref DOI

Main navigation

  • Home
    • Journal Information
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Reviewer Panel
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Journal Policies
    • Our CrossMark Policy
    • Publication Ethics
    • Issue in Progress
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Article processing fee
    • Track Manuscript Status
    • Get Publication Certificate
    • Join Editorial Board
    • Join Reviewer Panel
  • Contact us
  • Downloads

Efficacy of binary combinations of powders from selected botanicals against Callosobruchus maculatus Fabricius damage in stored cowpea seeds

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • Efficacy of Binary Combinations of Powders From Selected Botanicals Against Callosobruchus Maculatus Fabricius Damage In Stored Cowpea Seeds
  • Efficacy of binary combinations of powders from selected botanicals against Callosobruchus maculatus Fabricius damage in stored cowpea seeds

Jumoke Margaret BAKARE *, Thomas Inomisan OFUYA, Raphael Abiodun, ADEBAYO and Joy Ejemen IDOKO

Department of Crop, Soil & Pest Management, The Federal University of Technology, PMB 704, Akure, Nigeria.
 
Research Article
GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 2022, 11(03), 001–006.
Article DOI: 10.30574/gscarr.2022.11.3.0142
DOI url: https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2022.11.3.0142
Received on 26 April 2022; revised on 31 May 2022; accepted on 02 June 2022
 
The efficacy of powder mixes of two different insecticidal plants against Callosobruchus maculatus Fabricius was determined at the Entomology Research Laboratory, Department of Crop, Soil and Pest Management of the Federal University of Technology, Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria, under ambient laboratory conditions of 26 ± 4° C  and 65 ± 10%  RH.  The powder combinations were made from Azadirachta indica leaf   Thaumatococcous daniellii rhizome Eugenia aromatica dry flower buds, seeds of Piper guineense and rhizome of Zingiber officinale in a 1:1 ratio. The binary combinations were assessed at the dosages of 0.0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0 and 2.0 g per 20 g of cowpea seeds in separate 250 ml plastic containers with lids, against five pairs of newly emerged C. maculatus adults. Insect mortality was recorded 24, 48 and 72 hours post treatment and the number of F1 adult emergence was recorded after up to 35 days post treatment. The combination of E. aromatica and T. daniellii, and E. aromatica and Z. officinale produced 60% and 53% mortality respectively, of adults of C. maculatus at the lowest tested dosage (0.2 g/20 g of grain), and 100% and 83% mortality respectively, at the highest tested dosage (2.0 g/20 g of grain). Oviposition and progeny production of C. maculatus were also significantly lower in treatments involving the use of these two combinations; significantly fewer seeds bore beetle eggs and adult exit holes. The combination of E. aromatica and T. daniellii, and E. aromatica and Z. officinale may be included in pest management strategies for mitigating C. maculatus damage to stored cowpea.
 
Binary; Plant powder; Callosobruchus maculatus; Cowpea damage
 
https://gscarr.gsconlinepress.com/sites/default/files/fulltext_pdf/GSCARR-2022-…

Preview Article PDF

Jumoke Margaret BAKARE, Thomas Inomisan OFUYA, Raphael Abiodun, ADEBAYO and Joy Ejemen IDOKO. Efficacy of binary combinations of powders from selected botanicals against Callosobruchus maculatus Fabricius damage in stored cowpea seeds. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 2022, 11(3), 001-006. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2022.11.3.0142

Copyright © Author(s). All rights reserved. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.


All statements, opinions, and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s). The journal, editors, reviewers, and publisher disclaim any responsibility or liability for the content, including accuracy, completeness, or any consequences arising from its use.

Get Certificates

Get Publication Certificate

Download LoA

Check Corssref DOI details

Issue details

Issue Cover Page

Editorial Board

Table of content

Copyright © 2026 GSC Advanced Research and Reviews - All rights reserved

Developed & Designed by VS Infosolution