Home
GSC Advanced Research and Reviews
Peer-reviewed | Multidisciplinary Journal | Impact factor 8.3 | ISSN: 2582-4597 | Crossref DOI

Main navigation

  • Home
    • Journal Information
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Reviewer Panel
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Journal Policies
    • Our CrossMark Policy
    • Publication Ethics
    • Issue in Progress
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Article processing fee
    • Track Manuscript Status
    • Get Publication Certificate
    • Join Editorial Board
    • Join Reviewer Panel
  • Contact us
  • Downloads

Oil spill response strategies: A comparative conceptual study between the USA and Nigeria

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • Oil Spill Response Strategies: A Comparative Conceptual Study Between The USA and Nigeria
  • Oil spill response strategies: A comparative conceptual study between the USA and Nigeria

Adindu Donatus Ogbu 1, *, Williams Ozowe 2 and Augusta Heavens Ikevuje 3

1 Schlumberger (SLB), Port Harcourt, Nigeria and Mexico.
2 Independent Researcher, USA.
3 Independent Researcher, Houston Texas, USA.
 
Research Article
GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 2024, 20(01), 208–227.
Article DOI: 10.30574/gscarr.2024.20.1.0262
DOI url: https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2024.20.1.0262
Received on 05 June 2024; revised on 13 July 2024; accepted on 16 July 2024
 
This paper provides a comprehensive review of oil spill response strategies in the United States and Nigeria, aiming to dissect the effectiveness, challenges, and policy frameworks governing environmental disaster management in the context of oil spills. Through an exhaustive literature review, the paper compares and contrasts the approaches adopted by these two countries, highlighting the interplay of technological, regulatory, and socio-economic factors in shaping their response mechanisms.
The United States is portrayed as having a robust, technologically advanced, and well-coordinated response strategy, underpinned by stringent regulatory frameworks and significant investment in research and development. This comprehensive approach facilitates rapid containment and mitigation of spills, minimizing environmental and socio-economic impacts. Conversely, Nigeria’s response strategy is characterized by several challenges, including regulatory loopholes, inadequate enforcement, insufficient technological resources, and a lack of preparedness that exacerbate the consequences of oil spills on the environment and local communities.
Key findings emphasize the pivotal role of governance, technological readiness, and stakeholder collaboration in crafting effective oil spill response strategies. The comparative analysis reveals critical gaps in Nigeria’s oil spill response framework and suggests areas for improvement, such as strengthening legislation, enhancing technological capacity, and fostering international collaboration.
Concluding, the paper underscores the necessity for policy reforms and strategic investments in Nigeria to elevate its oil spill response capabilities. Drawing insights from the U.S. experience, it advocates for a holistic approach that integrates advanced technologies, effective governance, and community engagement to mitigate the impacts of oil spills. This review contributes to the discourse on environmental management, offering a foundation for future research and policy development aimed at enhancing oil spill response strategies globally.
 
Oil spill response; Technological innovation; Environmental policy; Global cooperation; Community engagement; USA-Nigeria bilateral cooperation; Ecosystem restoration; Prevention strategies; Nanotechnology; bioremediation; International collaboration; Environmental sustainability; Maritime environmental management; green technologies; Risk assessment
 
https://gscarr.gsconlinepress.com/sites/default/files/fulltext_pdf/GSCARR-2024-…

Preview Article PDF

Adindu Donatus Ogbu, Williams Ozowe and Augusta Heavens Ikevuje. Oil spill response strategies: A comparative conceptual study between the USA and Nigeria. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 2024, 20(1), 208-227. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2024.20.1.0262

Copyright © Author(s). All rights reserved. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.


All statements, opinions, and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s). The journal, editors, reviewers, and publisher disclaim any responsibility or liability for the content, including accuracy, completeness, or any consequences arising from its use.

Get Certificates

Get Publication Certificate

Download LoA

Check Corssref DOI details

Issue details

Issue Cover Page

Editorial Board

Table of content

Copyright © 2026 GSC Advanced Research and Reviews - All rights reserved

Developed & Designed by VS Infosolution