Home
GSC Advanced Research and Reviews
Peer-reviewed | Multidisciplinary Journal | Impact factor 8.3 | ISSN: 2582-4597 | Crossref DOI

Main navigation

  • Home
    • Journal Information
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Reviewer Panel
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Journal Policies
    • Our CrossMark Policy
    • Publication Ethics
    • Issue in Progress
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Article processing fee
    • Track Manuscript Status
    • Get Publication Certificate
    • Join Editorial Board
    • Join Reviewer Panel
  • Contact us
  • Downloads

THE PHYSICIAN THE WORLD NEVER GOT: SOS AGAINST POLICE VIOLENCE AND IMPUNITY IN BRAZIL

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • THE PHYSICIAN THE WORLD NEVER GOT: SOS AGAINST POLICE VIOLENCE AND IMPUNITY IN BRAZIL

Julio César Acosta-Navarro 1, * and Silvia Mônica Cárdenas Prado 2

1 Professor, Heart Institute (InCor), Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
2 Hospital das Clínicas, Department of Preventive Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
* Corresponding Author
ORCID Details
Julio César Acosta-Navarro: https:// ORCID: 0000-0002-4416-9372
Silvia Mônica Cárdenas Prado: https:// ORCID: 0000-0003-0263-8799

Case Report

GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 2026, 28(02), 160–166

Article DOI: 10.30574/gscarr.2026.28.2.0205

DOI url: https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2026.28.2.0205

Received on 12 July 2026; revised on 22 August 2026; accepted on 24 August 2026

Purpose: This case study documents 617 days of institutionalized impunity following the killing of a 22-year-old medical student, Marco Aurélio, by two military police officers in São Paulo, Brazil, and examines its implications for global medicine's responsibility toward violence against physicians and physicians-in-training. Case description: Marco Aurélio was pursued and killed near the hotel where he was staying; the state's own homicide investigation concluded the use of deadly force was not legitimate. Neither responding police officers nor firefighters transported him to nearby or adequately resourced emergency care. Over the following 617 days, judicial authorities denied pretrial detention of the officers five times, including once after the officers themselves sought a protective order against the victim's father. Both officers remain free and on active duty. Findings: The case reveals a self-reinforcing institutional pattern, in which police, prosecutorial, and judicial actors each decline accountability while deferring to one another, set against a documented national pattern of racially disproportionate police lethality in Brazil. Despite the absence of judicial action, the case has drawn formal recognition from universities, human rights bodies, and international forums. Conclusion: We argue that international medical associations, journals, and scientific societies hold an underused mandate to respond to violence against physicians and medical students when such violence is committed and then shielded by state institutions, and we call for three concrete actions: formal recognition of this mandate, extended editorial scrutiny of the conditions under which medicine is practiced worldwide, and formal expressions of professional solidarity.

Police Violence; Medical Education; Institutional Impunity; Human Rights; Physician Safety; Brazil

https://gscarr.gsconlinepress.com/sites/default/files/fulltext_pdf/GSCARR-2026-…

Preview Article PDF

Julio César Acosta-Navarro and Silvia Mônica Cárdenas Prado. THE PHYSICIAN THE WORLD NEVER GOT: SOS AGAINST POLICE VIOLENCE AND IMPUNITY IN BRAZIL. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 2026, 28(02), 160–166. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2026.28.2.0205.

Copyright © Author(s). All rights reserved. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.


All statements, opinions, and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s). The journal, editors, reviewers, and publisher disclaim any responsibility or liability for the content, including accuracy, completeness, or any consequences arising from its use.

Get Certificates

Get Publication Certificate

Download LoA

Check Corssref DOI details

Issue details

Issue Cover Page

Editorial Board

Table of content

Copyright © 2026 GSC Advanced Research and Reviews - All rights reserved

Developed & Designed by VS Infosolution