Home
GSC Advanced Research and Reviews
Peer-reviewed | Multidisciplinary Journal | Impact factor 8.3 | ISSN: 2582-4597 | Crossref DOI

Main navigation

  • Home
    • Journal Information
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Reviewer Panel
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Journal Policies
    • Our CrossMark Policy
    • Publication Ethics
    • Issue in Progress
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Article processing fee
    • Track Manuscript Status
    • Get Publication Certificate
    • Join Editorial Board
    • Join Reviewer Panel
  • Contact us
  • Downloads

Shelf life determination of two palm wine varieties and its effect on biochemical properties and enzyme production.

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • Shelf Life Determination of Two Palm Wine Varieties and Its Effect On Biochemical Properties and Enzyme Production.
  • Shelf life determination of two palm wine varieties and its effect on biochemical properties and enzyme production.

Chidimma Osilo 1, 2, *, Josephine C. Ohuche 1, Tobechukwu M.C. Ajogwu 1, Chinwendu N. Ozoh 1, Stanley E. Ezenwa 1 and Chinaza V. Okeke 1

1 Department of Applied Microbiology and Brewing, Faculty of Biosciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria.
2 Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Nigeria Nsukka, Nsukka, Nigeria.
 
Research Article
GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 2024, 19(03), 303–310.
Article DOI: 10.30574/gscarr.2024.19.3.0228
DOI url: https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2024.19.3.0228
 
 
Received on 09 May 2024; revised on 23 June 2024; accepted on 25 June 2024
 
In palm wine, the available complex microbiota plays very vital roles in the general attributes of the beverage as well as the significance of the various metabolites generated. This research focused on evaluating the biochemical properties of the palm wine obtained from two different varieties of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) and its potential enzyme activity, as well as assessing the effect of the changes that occur during the keeping time. The biochemical contents (alcohol, total titratable acid, reducing sugar, and pH) were evaluated every 2 h over a period of 144 h. The palm wine varieties were also analyzed for cellulase and amylase production.  There was an increase in ethanol for both varieties from 7.29±0.02% (1 h) to 14.82±0.02 (144 h) for variety 1, and from 8.35±0.01% (1 h) to 16.32±0.03% (144 h) for variety 2; the TTA increased with keeping time from 2.25±0.03% (1 h) to 4.42±0.03% (144 h) for variety 1, and from 2.35±0.02% (1h) to 5.01±0.04 (144 h) for variety 2. Reducing sugar decreased from 476.58±0.04 mg/L (1 h) to 42.84±0.75 mg/L (144 h) for variety 1, while variety 2 decreased from 238.18±0.05 mg/L (1 h) to 43.73±0.63 mg/L (144 h). The pH of the palm wine also experienced a decrease for variety 1 from 5.2±0.06 at 1 h to 2.8±0.17 at 144 h, while the variety 2 decreased from 4.8±0.17 at 1 h to 2.8±0.1 at 144 h. There was a reduction in the sugar content with the accumulation of alcohol, which occurred in both varieties, and a drop in the pH due to an increase in organic acids. The palm wine varieties were screened for cellulase and amylase activity, with the highest amylase yield for varieties 1 and 2 at 0.62 U/ml and 0.21 U/ml, respectively on the first day, while that of cellulase was observed at 48 h (0.34 U/ml) for V1 and at 1 h (0.2 U/ml) for V2. The result of this current study proves the importance of the microbial consortium in fresh palm wine as well as its potential as a source of enzyme production, and also shows that these parameters are affected by the keeping time.
 
Palm wine; Fermentation; Biochemical analysis; Storage; Ethanol; Enzyme
 
https://gscarr.gsconlinepress.com/sites/default/files/fulltext_pdf/GSCARR-2024-…

Preview Article PDF

Chidimma Osilo, Josephine C. Ohuche, Tobechukwu M.C. Ajogwu, Chinwendu N. Ozoh, Stanley E. Ezenwa and Chinaza V. Okeke. Shelf life determination of two palm wine varieties and its effect on biochemical properties and enzyme production.. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 2024, 19(3), 303-310. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2024.19.3.0228

Copyright © Author(s). All rights reserved. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.


All statements, opinions, and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s). The journal, editors, reviewers, and publisher disclaim any responsibility or liability for the content, including accuracy, completeness, or any consequences arising from its use.

Get Certificates

Get Publication Certificate

Download LoA

Check Corssref DOI details

Issue details

Issue Cover Page

Editorial Board

Table of content

Copyright © 2026 GSC Advanced Research and Reviews - All rights reserved

Developed & Designed by VS Infosolution