Home
GSC Advanced Research and Reviews
Peer-reviewed | Multidisciplinary Journal | Impact factor 8.3 | ISSN: 2582-4597 | Crossref DOI

Main navigation

  • Home
    • Journal Information
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Reviewer Panel
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Journal Policies
    • Our CrossMark Policy
    • Publication Ethics
    • Issue in Progress
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Article processing fee
    • Track Manuscript Status
    • Get Publication Certificate
    • Join Editorial Board
    • Join Reviewer Panel
  • Contact us
  • Downloads

Static PPP over observation time using magic-GNSS: GPS Vs. GLONASS Vs. GPS+GLONASS

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • Static PPP Over Observation Time Using Magic-GNSS: GPS Vs. GLONASS Vs. GPS+GLONASS
  • Static PPP over observation time using magic-GNSS: GPS Vs. GLONASS Vs. GPS+GLONASS

Mustafa M. Amami *

Department of Civil Engineering, Benghazi University, Benghazi, Libya.

Research Article

GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 2026, 27(02), 001-007

Article DOI: 10.30574/gscarr.2026.27.2.0105

DOI url: https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2026.27.2.0105

Received on 17 March 2026; revised on 02 May 2026; accepted on 05 May 2026

This study investigates the performance of static Precise Point Positioning (PPP) as a function of fixing duration using the magic-GNSS free online service. The platform supports processing of GPS-only, GLONASS-only, and combined GPS+GLONASS observations, enabling a direct comparison between individual and integrated satellite systems. The evaluation was conducted under open-sky conditions to minimize multipath effects. Dual-frequency GNSS observations were collected from ten well-distributed stations, each with a continuous 24-hour observation session. Static PPP solutions were generated for fixing intervals starting from 1 hour and progressively increasing up to 24 hours. The 24-hour solution was adopted as the reference to assess the accuracy of shorter observation durations. The results reveal that the GPS-only and GPS+GLONASS solutions are identical, indicating that the magic-GNSS processing strategy relies primarily on GPS observations when they are available. In contrast, GLONASS-only results demonstrate superior performance during short observation periods. Within the first hour, GLONASS achieves lower average absolute errors than GPS by approximately 1.5 cm, 2 cm, 2 cm, 2 cm, and 3 cm in the Easting, Northing, Height, 2D, and 3D components, respectively. The 1 cm accuracy level in the horizontal plane is reached after approximately 7.5 hours using GPS-only observations, compared to only 3 hours using GLONASS-only. For the height component, the same accuracy level is achieved after 7.5 hours and 4 hours, respectively. Furthermore, both systems converge to millimeter-level accuracy with longer observation durations. In the horizontal components, GPS and GLONASS reach approximately 1 mm accuracy after 15 hours and 6 hours, respectively, while in the vertical component, this level is achieved after approximately 14 hours for GPS and 15 hours for GLONASS. These findings confirm that both GPS-only and GLONASS-only PPP can deliver accurate and reliable positioning under open-sky conditions when sufficient observation time and precise ephemerides are used. However, GLONASS-only observations exhibit significantly faster convergence, reaching centimeter-level accuracy in both horizontal and vertical components in a shorter time compared to GPS-only.

GPS; Precise Point Positioning; magic-GNSS; Static Positioning; Fixing Time

https://gscarr.gsconlinepress.com/sites/default/files/fulltext_pdf/GSCARR-2026-…

Preview Article PDF

Mustafa M. Amami. Static PPP over observation time using magic-GNSS: GPS Vs. GLONASS Vs. GPS+GLONASS. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 2026, 27(02), 001-007. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2026.27.2.0105.

Copyright © Author(s). All rights reserved. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.


All statements, opinions, and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s). The journal, editors, reviewers, and publisher disclaim any responsibility or liability for the content, including accuracy, completeness, or any consequences arising from its use.

Get Certificates

Get Publication Certificate

Download LoA

Check Corssref DOI details

Issue details

Issue Cover Page

Editorial Board

Table of content

Copyright © 2026 GSC Advanced Research and Reviews - All rights reserved

Developed & Designed by VS Infosolution