Home
GSC Advanced Research and Reviews
Peer-reviewed | Multidisciplinary Journal | Impact factor 8.3 | ISSN: 2582-4597 | Crossref DOI

Main navigation

  • Home
    • Journal Information
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Reviewer Panel
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Journal Policies
    • Our CrossMark Policy
    • Publication Ethics
    • Issue in Progress
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Article processing fee
    • Track Manuscript Status
    • Get Publication Certificate
    • Join Editorial Board
    • Join Reviewer Panel
  • Contact us
  • Downloads

The use of point of care protease diagnostics to improve wound healing: A prospective case-controlled study

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • The Use of Point of Care Protease Diagnostics To Improve Wound Healing: A Prospective Case-controlled Study
  • The use of point of care protease diagnostics to improve wound healing: A prospective case-controlled study

Claudio Ligresti 1, *, Marcello Del Zotti 2, Giuseppe Giudice 3 and Fabrizio Malàn 4

1 Department of Plastic Surgery, S. Anna Hospital Asti, Italy.
2 Department of Plastic Surgery, Policlinico Hospital Bari, Italy.
3 Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Bari, Italy.
4 Department of Plastic Surgery, CTO Turin, Italy.
 
Research Article
GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 2025, 23(01), 072-079.
Article DOI: 10.30574/gscarr.2025.23.1.0105
DOI url: https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2025.23.1.0105
Received on 25 February 2025; revised on 07 April 2025; accepted on 09 April 2025
 
Forty patients with chronic ulcers (Intervention Group), treated at four Italian wound clinics were enrolled and treated based on the TIMEH principles. Therapy decisions were assisted by two qualitative lateral flow point of care (PoC) tests, WOUNDCHEKTM Bacterial Status and WOUNDCHEKTM Protease Status, that detect bacterial protease activity (BPA) and elevated host inflammatory protease activity (EPA) respectively. Outcomes were monitored for 30 days. The outcomes and treatments were compared with a Control Group that were not tested. The Control Group had significantly more trauma wounds, so all patients and those with trauma wounds removed were analysed separately. Using test results to inform treatment decisions was strongly associated with increased rates of healing and improvement, odds ratio 13.00, 95% CI 4.16-40.66, p<0.0001 (all data) or odds ratio 10.40, 95% CI 3.13-34.53, p=0.0001 (trauma wounds removed). Significantly more surgical debridement (all data p=0.0089, trauma wound removed p=0.0025), systemic antibiotics (all data p=0.0036, trauma wounds removed p=0.0005) and significantly less antiseptics (all data p=0.0001, trauma wounds removed p=0.0001) were used in the Intervention Group. The percentage of wounds positive for BPA or having EPA reduced over time and was associated with improving mean TIMEH scores in the Intervention Group, suggesting treatment modifications stimulated by testing had improved outcomes.  The expeditious test results were useful in determining treatment choice, monitoring effectiveness of treatment and especially helpful in judicious use of advanced therapies and invasive surgical interventions. This study confirms using PoC tests for BPA and EPA can assist treatment decisions and improve healing. 
 
Wounds; Diagnostics; Protease; Infection; Inflammation; Healing
 
https://gscarr.gsconlinepress.com/sites/default/files/fulltext_pdf/GSCARR-2025-…

Preview Article PDF

Claudio Ligresti, Marcello Del Zotti, Giuseppe Giudice and Fabrizio Malàn. The use of point of care protease diagnostics to improve wound healing: A prospective case-controlled study. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 2025, 23(1), 072-079. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2025.23.1.0105

Copyright © Author(s). All rights reserved. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.


All statements, opinions, and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s). The journal, editors, reviewers, and publisher disclaim any responsibility or liability for the content, including accuracy, completeness, or any consequences arising from its use.

Get Certificates

Get Publication Certificate

Download LoA

Check Corssref DOI details

Issue details

Issue Cover Page

Editorial Board

Table of content

Copyright © 2026 GSC Advanced Research and Reviews - All rights reserved

Developed & Designed by VS Infosolution