Home
GSC Advanced Research and Reviews
Peer-reviewed | Multidisciplinary Journal | Impact factor 8.3 | ISSN: 2582-4597 | Crossref DOI

Main navigation

  • Home
    • Journal Information
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Reviewer Panel
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Journal Policies
    • Our CrossMark Policy
    • Publication Ethics
    • Issue in Progress
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Article processing fee
    • Track Manuscript Status
    • Get Publication Certificate
    • Join Editorial Board
    • Join Reviewer Panel
  • Contact us
  • Downloads

Assessment of the effectiveness of adaptive traffic signal control systems in reducing pedestrian-vehicle conflicts at high-risk crossings

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • Assessment of The Effectiveness of Adaptive Traffic Signal Control Systems In Reducing Pedestrian-vehicle Conflicts At High-risk Crossings
  • Assessment of the effectiveness of adaptive traffic signal control systems in reducing pedestrian-vehicle conflicts at high-risk crossings

Samuel Omefe *

Department of Civil Engineering, George Washington University, Washington DC, USA.
 
Research Article
GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 2025, 24(01), 140-153.
Article DOI: 10.30574/gscarr.2025.24.1.0191
DOI url: https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2025.24.1.0191
GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 2025, 24(01), 140-153
 
Adaptive Traffic Signal Control (ATSC) systems represent a critical advancement in urban traffic management, offering significant potential for reducing pedestrian-vehicle conflicts at high-risk crossings. This review paper examines the effectiveness of ATSC systems in enhancing pedestrian safety through real-time signal optimization and intelligent traffic management. We analyze recent developments in adaptive signal technologies, including machine learning-based systems, connected vehicle integration, and multi-modal optimization approaches that prioritize pedestrian safety alongside traffic efficiency. The paper explores various ATSC architectures, from basic actuated systems to sophisticated deep reinforcement learning models, and their performance in reducing conflict points between pedestrians and vehicles. Recent field studies demonstrate that advanced ATSC systems can reduce pedestrian-vehicle conflicts by up to 40% while simultaneously improving overall traffic flow efficiency. However, challenges persist in balancing competing demands between vehicular throughput and pedestrian safety, particularly in high-density urban environments. This review synthesizes current research findings, identifies implementation barriers, and highlights the critical role of real-time pedestrian detection technologies in enabling safer adaptive signal control. Our analysis reveals that while ATSC systems show considerable promise for improving pedestrian safety, their effectiveness varies significantly based on intersection geometry, traffic patterns, and system sophistication. The integration of emerging technologies such as computer vision, artificial intelligence, and vehicle-to-infrastructure communication presents opportunities for next-generation ATSC systems that can more effectively balance safety and efficiency objectives.
 
Adaptive Traffic Signal Control; Pedestrian Safety; Vehicle-Pedestrian Conflicts; Intelligent Transportation Systems; Real-time Traffic Management; Urban Safety
 
https://gscarr.gsconlinepress.com/sites/default/files/fulltext_pdf/GSCARR-2025-…

Preview Article PDF

Samuel Omefe. Assessment of the effectiveness of adaptive traffic signal control systems in reducing pedestrian-vehicle conflicts at high-risk crossings. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 2025, 24(1), 140-153. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2025.24.1.0191

Copyright © Author(s). All rights reserved. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.


All statements, opinions, and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s). The journal, editors, reviewers, and publisher disclaim any responsibility or liability for the content, including accuracy, completeness, or any consequences arising from its use.

Get Certificates

Get Publication Certificate

Download LoA

Check Corssref DOI details

Issue details

Issue Cover Page

Editorial Board

Table of content

Copyright © 2026 GSC Advanced Research and Reviews - All rights reserved

Developed & Designed by VS Infosolution