Home
GSC Advanced Research and Reviews
Peer-reviewed | Multidisciplinary Journal | Impact factor 8.3 | ISSN: 2582-4597 | Crossref DOI

Main navigation

  • Home
    • Journal Information
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Reviewer Panel
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Journal Policies
    • Our CrossMark Policy
    • Publication Ethics
    • Issue in Progress
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Article processing fee
    • Track Manuscript Status
    • Get Publication Certificate
    • Join Editorial Board
    • Join Reviewer Panel
  • Contact us
  • Downloads

Comparative analysis of carbon sequestration in cocoa-based agroforestry systems in Bonon (Central-Western Côte d’Ivoire)

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • Comparative Analysis of Carbon Sequestration In Cocoa-based Agroforestry Systems In Bonon (Central-Western Côte D’Ivoire)
  • Comparative analysis of carbon sequestration in cocoa-based agroforestry systems in Bonon (Central-Western Côte d’Ivoire)

Kouassi Apollinaire KOUAKOU 1, *, Annie Yvette ASSALE 1, Achille N’Guessan KOFFI 2 and Paulin ZIGBE 1

1 Environment Training and Research Unit, Jean Lorougnon Guédé University of Daloa. PO Box 150 Daloa. Côte d’Ivoire.

2 Agroforestry Training and Research Unit, Jean Lorougnon Guédé University of Daloa. PO Box 150 Daloa. Côte d’Ivoire.

Research Article
GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 2026, 26(01), 237-252.
Article DOI: 10.30574/gscarr.2026.26.1.0028
DOI url: https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2026.26.1.0028

Received on 19 December 2025; revised on 28 January 2026; accepted on 30 January 2026

This study investigates the ecological role of cocoa-based agroforestry systems (AFS) in Bonon. located in the Central-Western region of Côte d’Ivoire. Floristic inventories were conducted in 72 plots (25 m × 25 m) established across 52 cocoa plantations. To identify structurally homogeneous agroforestry systems. a hierarchical cluster analysis based on the coordinates of factorial axes derived from Multiple Factor Analysis was applied. resulting in the classification of three distinct AFS groups. Group 1 (61.53%) is characterized by a high density of productive cocoa trees (734.4 stems ha⁻¹) and a low abundance of associated shade trees. Group 2 (26.53%) comprises cocoa plantations with a moderate density of associated trees (651.5 stems ha⁻¹) and an average species richness of 8.6 species per plantation. Group 3 (11.54%) includes cocoa plantations integrating perennial crops such as coffee and cashew in active production. The mean aboveground biomass of cocoa trees and associated shade trees across the three AFS groups was estimated at 23.08 t DM ha⁻¹. Biomass was highest in Group 2 (30.48 t DM ha⁻¹). followed by Group 1 (22.71 t DM ha⁻¹). whereas Group 3 exhibited the lowest biomass (16.06 t DM ha⁻¹). The average carbon stock across AFS groups was 11.54 t C ha⁻¹. with Group 2 showing the highest carbon stock (15.24 t C ha⁻¹). consistent with its greater biomass accumulation. Overall. carbon sequestration and storage capacity in cocoa agroforestry systems are strongly influenced by farmers’ management practices and structural attributes. including tree density. species diversity. tree height. and diameter.

Agroforestry systems; Plant diversity; Carbon sequestration; Climate change; Côte d’Ivoire

https://gscarr.gsconlinepress.com/sites/default/files/fulltext_pdf/GSCARR-2026-…

Preview Article PDF

Kouassi Apollinaire KOUAKOU, Annie Yvette ASSALE, Achille N’Guessan KOFFI and Paulin ZIGBE. Comparative analysis of carbon sequestration in cocoa-based agroforestry systems in Bonon (Central-Western Côte d’Ivoire). GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 2026, 26(1), 237-252. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2026.26.1.0028

Copyright © Author(s). All rights reserved. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.


All statements, opinions, and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s). The journal, editors, reviewers, and publisher disclaim any responsibility or liability for the content, including accuracy, completeness, or any consequences arising from its use.

Get Certificates

Get Publication Certificate

Download LoA

Check Corssref DOI details

Issue details

Issue Cover Page

Editorial Board

Table of content

Copyright © 2026 GSC Advanced Research and Reviews - All rights reserved

Developed & Designed by VS Infosolution