Home
GSC Advanced Research and Reviews
Peer-reviewed | Multidisciplinary Journal | Impact factor 8.3 | ISSN: 2582-4597 | Crossref DOI

Main navigation

  • Home
    • Journal Information
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Reviewer Panel
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Journal Policies
    • Our CrossMark Policy
    • Publication Ethics
    • Issue in Progress
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Article processing fee
    • Track Manuscript Status
    • Get Publication Certificate
    • Join Editorial Board
    • Join Reviewer Panel
  • Contact us
  • Downloads

ANALYSIS OF INDIGENOUS PERCEPTIONS OF THE FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO SOIL DEGRADATION IN THE 2 KP COMMUNES (KOUANDÉ, KÉROU AND PÉHUNCO), NORTHWESTERN BENIN

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • ANALYSIS OF INDIGENOUS PERCEPTIONS OF THE FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO SOIL DEGRADATION IN THE 2 KP COMMUNES (KOUANDÉ, KÉROU AND PÉHUNCO), NORTHWESTERN BENIN

Louis Dèdègbê AHOMADIKPOHOU 1, 2, *

1 Institut du Cadre de Vie (ICaV), Université d'Abomey-Calavi, Bénin.
2 Laboratoire de Géographie Rurale et d'Expertise Agricole (LaGREA), Université d'Abomey-Calavi, Bénin.
* Corresponding Author
ORCID Details
Louis Dèdègbê AHOMADIKPOHOU: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2256-2487

Research Article

GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 2026, 29(01), 067–079

Article DOI: 10.30574/gscarr.2026.29.1.0259

DOI url: https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2026.29.1.0259

Received on 22 August 2026; revised on 29 September 2026; accepted on 02 October 2026

In the communes of Kouandé, Kérou and Péhunco (2 KP), soil degradation is a major concern for farming communities. This study analyses indigenous perceptions of the factors responsible for soil degradation in these three communes. The methodological approach combined a literature review, field observations and surveys of local stakeholders. A sample of 364 farming households was determined using the Schwartz (1995) method, with a 95% confidence level and a 5% margin of error. The data collected were analysed using the Importance Value (IV) and the Consensus Value (UCs) proposed by Byg and Balslev (2001), together with Correspondence Factor Analysis (CFA).
The results show that 45.71% of respondents considered the land to be poorly fertile, compared with 37.60% who considered it fertile and 16.97% very fertile. Among the direct factors, farming practices had the highest importance value (IV = 0.43), followed by forest exploitation (IV = 0.20) and erosion (IV = 0.15), while hunting (IV = 0.05) was perceived as having low importance; the highest consensus value was recorded for farming practices (UCs = 0.87). Among the indirect factors, population growth (IV = 0.45) and urbanisation (IV = 0.25) ranked highest, with consensus values of 0.90 and 0.50 respectively. CFA revealed variations in perceptions across the communes: erosion and hunting were more strongly associated with Kouandé, farming practices and livestock farming with Kérou, and forest exploitation and climate with Péhunco. For the indirect factors, urbanisation and land tenure were associated with Kérou, population growth with Kouandé, and agricultural colonisation together with natural-resource-management policy with Péhunco. The study shows that farming practices and population growth are perceived as the principal factors of soil degradation in the 2 KP communes.

Soil Degradation; Indigenous Perceptions; Farming Practices; Population Growth; Kouandé; Kérou; Péhunco

https://gscarr.gsconlinepress.com/sites/default/files/fulltext_pdf/GSCARR-2026-…

Preview Article PDF

Louis Dèdègbê AHOMADIKPOHOU. ANALYSIS OF INDIGENOUS PERCEPTIONS OF THE FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO SOIL DEGRADATION IN THE 2 KP COMMUNES (KOUANDÉ, KÉROU AND PÉHUNCO), NORTHWESTERN BENIN. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 2026, 29(01), 067–079. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2026.29.1.0259.

Copyright © Author(s). All rights reserved. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.


All statements, opinions, and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s). The journal, editors, reviewers, and publisher disclaim any responsibility or liability for the content, including accuracy, completeness, or any consequences arising from its use.

Get Certificates

Get Publication Certificate

Download LoA

Check Corssref DOI details

Issue details

Issue Cover Page

Editorial Board

Table of content

Copyright © 2026 GSC Advanced Research and Reviews - All rights reserved

Developed & Designed by VS Infosolution