Home
GSC Advanced Research and Reviews
Peer-reviewed | Multidisciplinary Journal | Impact factor 8.3 | ISSN: 2582-4597 | Crossref DOI

Main navigation

  • Home
    • Journal Information
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Reviewer Panel
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Journal Policies
    • Our CrossMark Policy
    • Publication Ethics
    • Issue in Progress
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Article processing fee
    • Track Manuscript Status
    • Get Publication Certificate
    • Join Editorial Board
    • Join Reviewer Panel
  • Contact us
  • Downloads

Performance Evaluation of Key Performance Indicators for UMTS Networks in Calabar, Nigeria

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • Performance Evaluation of Key Performance Indicators For UMTS Networks In Calabar, Nigeria
  • Performance Evaluation of Key Performance Indicators for UMTS Networks in Calabar, Nigeria

Ukoette Jeremiah Ekah * and Joel Iloke

Department of Physics, Cross River University of Technology, Calabar, Nigeria
 
Research Article
GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 2022, 10(01), 047-052.
Article DOI: 10.30574/gscarr.2022.10.1.0023
DOI url: https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2022.10.1.0023
Received on 09 December 2021; revised on 12 January 2022; accepted on 14 January 2022
For appropriate regulation and quality assurance, continuous monitoring of cellular network services is necessary. A drive test measurement was carried out in Calabar, to investigate four UMTS networks, taking cognizance of Call Setup Success Rate (CSSR), Drop Call Rate (DCR), Handover Success Rate (HOSR), Call Setup Time (CST), Received Signal Code Power (RSCP) and Signal-to-Interference Ratio (Ec/Io). The collected data was analyzed and the obtained results was compared with the performance threshold levels of the Nigerian Communication Commission (NCC). The four networks had excellent CST, with MTN leading, followed by Airtel, then 9mobile and Globacom. For CSSR, Airtel had excellent performance, as there was no blocked call. This was followed by MTN and Globacom. 9mobile failed in CSSR as it was below the NCC recommended benchmark. There was no drop call in Airtel, MTN and 9mobile, but Globacom’s performance was below the recommended threshold for dropped calls. For HOSR, the four networks showed excellent performance as they were able to handover calls between cells, as recommended by NCC. Considering the RSCP, the four networks displayed excellent services as subscribers experienced good voice and data services. However, the four networks had poor coverage quality (Ec/Io), the worst, being displayed by MTN. This shows that the equipment capability of the networks is low. The network operators are advised to monitor their services often, so as to optimize their networks for a better Quality of Service (QoS). 
 
Call setup time; Call setup success rate; Drop call rate; Handover success rate; Call setup time; Received Signal Code Power; Signal-to-Interference ratio
https://gscarr.gsconlinepress.com/sites/default/files/fulltext_pdf/GSCARR-2022-…

Preview Article PDF

Ukoette Jeremiah Ekah and Joel Iloke. Performance Evaluation of Key Performance Indicators for UMTS Networks in Calabar, Nigeria. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 2022, 10(1), 047-052. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2022.10.1.0023

Copyright © Author(s). All rights reserved. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.


All statements, opinions, and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s). The journal, editors, reviewers, and publisher disclaim any responsibility or liability for the content, including accuracy, completeness, or any consequences arising from its use.

Get Certificates

Get Publication Certificate

Download LoA

Check Corssref DOI details

Issue details

Issue Cover Page

Editorial Board

Table of content

Copyright © 2026 GSC Advanced Research and Reviews - All rights reserved

Developed & Designed by VS Infosolution