Home
GSC Advanced Research and Reviews
Peer-reviewed | Multidisciplinary Journal | Impact factor 8.3 | ISSN: 2582-4597 | Crossref DOI

Main navigation

  • Home
    • Journal Information
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Reviewer Panel
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Journal Policies
    • Our CrossMark Policy
    • Publication Ethics
    • Issue in Progress
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Article processing fee
    • Track Manuscript Status
    • Get Publication Certificate
    • Join Editorial Board
    • Join Reviewer Panel
  • Contact us
  • Downloads

Comparative laboratory diagnosis of malaria: Microscopy versus rapid diagnostic test kits in a tertiary institution of North-Central Nigeria

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • Comparative Laboratory Diagnosis of Malaria: Microscopy Versus Rapid Diagnostic Test Kits In a Tertiary Institution of North-Central Nigeria
  • Comparative laboratory diagnosis of malaria: Microscopy versus rapid diagnostic test kits in a tertiary institution of North-Central Nigeria

Aminat Omope Yusuf 1, *, Timothy Olugbenga Ogundeko 2, Mamzil Seljul Crown Ramyil 1, Catherine Nadabo 1, Philemon Adu 3, Olusegun Godwin Adeniyi 4 and Amos Paul Bassi 3

1 Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, College of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences, Bingham University, Jos Campus, Nigeria.
2 Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, College of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences, Bingham University, Jos Campus, Nigeria.
3 Department of Community Medicine, College of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences, Bingham University, Jos Campus, Nigeria.
4 Department of Haematology and Blood Transfusion, College of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences, Bingham University, Jos Campus, Nigeria.
 
Research Article
GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 2022, 13(02), 145-149.
Article DOI: 10.30574/gscarr.2022.13.2.0319
DOI url: https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2022.13.2.0319
Received on 03 October 2022; revised on 16 November 2022; accepted on 19November 2022
 
Laboratory diagnosis of malaria is a vital key for its effective management. Diagnosis of malaria includes rapid, sensitive, and specific test methods. This study was aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of PfHRP2 rapid malaria test with reference to light microscopy for the diagnosis of malaria at the Bingham University Teaching Hospital (BhUTH) Jos –Plateau State, Nigeria. A total of 150 febrile patients attending BHUTH who were sent to the Hospital Laboratory from the General out patients Department (GOPD) for malaria parasite test (MPT)request had their blood sample collected and tested for malaria parasites (MP) using Field Stain A and B stain microscopy and PfHRP2 rapid malaria test between September and November 2021.Results shows that the sensitivity and specificity of PfHRP2 rapid malaria were 9.23% and 90.0% respectively, with corresponding positive and negative predictive values (PPV) as 90.0%and (NPV) as13. 2%. PfHRP2 rapid malaria test showed good sensitivity and specificity that is in agreement with that of the reference light microscopy. The rapid diagnostic test (RDT) results compared well with the light microscopy (Gold standard) for Laboratory diagnosis for malaria. Sustained use of RDT as an alternative to light microscopy is recommended especially in malaria endemic areas and the rural communities where electricity is out of reach.
Malaria; HRP-2; Plasmodium falciparum; Sensitivity; Specificity; Comparison
https://gscarr.gsconlinepress.com/sites/default/files/fulltext_pdf/GSCARR-2022-…

Preview Article PDF

Aminat Omope Yusuf, Timothy Olugbenga Ogundeko, Mamzil Seljul Crown Ramyil, Catherine Nadabo, Philemon Adu, Olusegun Godwin Adeniyi and Amos Paul Bassi. Comparative laboratory diagnosis of malaria: Microscopy versus rapid diagnostic test kits in a tertiary institution of North-Central Nigeria. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 2022, 13(2), 145-149. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2022.13.2.0319

Copyright © Author(s). All rights reserved. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.


All statements, opinions, and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s). The journal, editors, reviewers, and publisher disclaim any responsibility or liability for the content, including accuracy, completeness, or any consequences arising from its use.

Get Certificates

Get Publication Certificate

Download LoA

Check Corssref DOI details

Issue details

Issue Cover Page

Editorial Board

Table of content

Copyright © 2026 GSC Advanced Research and Reviews - All rights reserved

Developed & Designed by VS Infosolution