Home
GSC Advanced Research and Reviews
Peer-reviewed | Multidisciplinary Journal | Impact factor 8.3 | ISSN: 2582-4597 | Crossref DOI

Main navigation

  • Home
    • Journal Information
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Reviewer Panel
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Journal Policies
    • Our CrossMark Policy
    • Publication Ethics
    • Issue in Progress
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Article processing fee
    • Track Manuscript Status
    • Get Publication Certificate
    • Join Editorial Board
    • Join Reviewer Panel
  • Contact us
  • Downloads

A SWOT analysis of community-based forest management policy as a basis for REDD+ in Tanzania

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • A SWOT Analysis of Community-based Forest Management Policy As a Basis For REDD+ In Tanzania
  • A SWOT analysis of community-based forest management policy as a basis for REDD+ in Tanzania

Emmanuel Fred Nzunda and Bernardol John Manyanda *

Department of Forest Resources Assessment and Management, College of Forestry, Wildlife and Tourism, Sokoine University of Agriculture, P.O. Box 3013, Chuo Kikuu, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Research Article
GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 2023, 15(03), 022–037.
Article DOI: 10.30574/gscarr.2023.15.3.0157
DOI url: https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2023.15.3.0157
Received on 16 April 2023; revised on 28 May 2023; accepted on 31 May 2023
In developing countries, the failure of the policing model of forest management whereby the central government protected forest reserves by preventing local communities from using them led to the emergence of the Participatory Forest Management (PFM) policy. In Tanzania, PFM takes two main forms; Joint Forest Management (JFM) in which central government or district council owns the forest and the local people are involved in conservation. Community Based Forest Management (CBFM) policy as the second form whereby community is given the right to own and use the forest in the general land. The paper discusses the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of the policy of community -based forest management in Tanzania. Among the strengths are the government structures with strong village’s administrative structure, willingness of people to participate in CBFM initiatives, community-village collaboration and ecological sustainability. The fact that the approach is exogenous both in conception and funding, inadequacy of technical knowledge at the community level, inequality in cost and benefit sharing, poor infrastructure and poor governance of revenue accrued from CBFM are seen as weaknesses of CBFM. Opportunities for CBFM include appropriate national policies and international conventions, and the existence of vast forest areas on general land that provide room for the implementation of the CBFM activities. Threats to CBFM include; conflict of interest with the district and higher-level government, poor governance, and human-wildlife conflicts. The paper concludes by suggesting the way forward for tapping the strengths and opportunities of CBFM and addressing its weaknesses and threats.
Governance; Local communities; Participatory Forest Management; Policy; REDD+; SWOT analysis
https://gscarr.gsconlinepress.com/sites/default/files/fulltext_pdf/GSCARR-2023-…

Preview Article PDF

Emmanuel Fred Nzunda and Bernardol John Manyanda. A SWOT analysis of community-based forest management policy as a basis for REDD+ in Tanzania. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 2023, 15(3), 022-027. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2023.15.3.0157

Copyright © Author(s). All rights reserved. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.


All statements, opinions, and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s). The journal, editors, reviewers, and publisher disclaim any responsibility or liability for the content, including accuracy, completeness, or any consequences arising from its use.

Get Certificates

Get Publication Certificate

Download LoA

Check Corssref DOI details

Issue details

Issue Cover Page

Editorial Board

Table of content

Copyright © 2026 GSC Advanced Research and Reviews - All rights reserved

Developed & Designed by VS Infosolution