Home
GSC Advanced Research and Reviews
Peer-reviewed | Multidisciplinary Journal | Impact factor 8.3 | ISSN: 2582-4597 | Crossref DOI

Main navigation

  • Home
    • Journal Information
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Reviewer Panel
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Journal Policies
    • Our CrossMark Policy
    • Publication Ethics
    • Issue in Progress
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Article processing fee
    • Track Manuscript Status
    • Get Publication Certificate
    • Join Editorial Board
    • Join Reviewer Panel
  • Contact us
  • Downloads

Comparative analysis of tick burden, diversity, and distribution in intensively managed wildlife estates with and without prescribed burning

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • Comparative Analysis of Tick Burden, Diversity, and Distribution In Intensively Managed Wildlife Estates With and Without Prescribed Burning
  • Comparative analysis of tick burden, diversity, and distribution in intensively managed wildlife estates with and without prescribed burning

Maambo Bhagoos 1, Tasha Siame 2, *, Musso Munyeme 1 and Enala Tembo Mwase 1

1 Department of Disease Control, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zambia, P.O Box 32379, Lusaka, Zambia.
2 Faculty of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University Bloomington, IN, USA.
 
Research Article
GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 2023, 17(03), 169–180.
Article DOI: 10.30574/gscarr.2023.17.3.0483
DOI url: https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2023.17.3.0483
Received on 10 November 2023; revised on 22 December 2023; accepted on 25 December 2023
The connection between ticks and zoonotic diseases in Zambia remains unclear due to limited data on tick distribution in private game reserves. This study examines tick control in three ex-situ game reserves across different agro-ecological regions, Lanagani game ranch in the Chibombo district, Chaminuka game ranch in the Lusaka district, and Choma game ranch in the Choma district. The current study evaluated the burden and diversity of ticks across three different management systems concerning the use of fire as a tick control and management tool.
A descriptive cross-sectional study collected 267 ticks from 36 transects across three game ranches in Central, Lusaka, and Southern provinces. These ticks were morphologically identified using the existing taxonomic keys and Olympus DF Plapo 1×4 SN5G 08128 stereomicroscope at the University of Zambia, School of Veterinary Medicine, parasitology laboratory. The Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to compare means between categories and correlation coefficient to determine the strength of the relationship.
The collected species included 11 Rhipicephalus species, n=6, (Rhipicephalus appendiculatus, Rhipicephalus evertsi, Rhipicephalus microplus, Rhipicephalus decoloratus, Rhipicephalus sanguineus, Rhipicephalus pulcherus, Rhipicephalus zambeziensis); Amblyomma species n=2, (Amblyomma variagatum, Amblyomma poposum), and Hyalomma species n=2 (Hyalomma Rufipes and Hyalomma truncatum). The most common species were R. evertsi (19.4 %), Amblyomma variagatum 14%, Hyalomma truncatum 11%. Significantly higher (p < 0.05) species diversity and burden were observed in the no-burn management system, whilst no significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed between late and early burning systems.
These findings have unveiled, for the first time in Zambia, that employing fire as a management tool substantially reduces both tick diversity and burden in enclosed ex-situ conservancy areas. Regular prescribed burning, regardless of the burning regime, was found to remarkably reduce tick populations in game ranches, particularly in the early burning management system. These findings hold promising implications for ecological public health. Considering this, fire as a management tool effectively reduces tick diversity and burden in closed ex-situ conservancy areas. These findings have far-reaching policy implications when it comes to tick control systems that a government may wish to implement.
Ticks; Ex-situ game reserves; Management systems; Zambia
https://gscarr.gsconlinepress.com/sites/default/files/fulltext_pdf/GSCARR-2023-…

Preview Article PDF

Maambo Bhagoos, Tasha Siame, Musso Munyeme and Enala Tembo Mwase. Comparative analysis of tick burden, diversity, and distribution in intensively managed wildlife estates with and without prescribed burning. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 2023, 17(3), 169-180. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2023.17.3.0483

Copyright © Author(s). All rights reserved. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.


All statements, opinions, and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s). The journal, editors, reviewers, and publisher disclaim any responsibility or liability for the content, including accuracy, completeness, or any consequences arising from its use.

Get Certificates

Get Publication Certificate

Download LoA

Check Corssref DOI details

Issue details

Issue Cover Page

Editorial Board

Table of content

Copyright © 2026 GSC Advanced Research and Reviews - All rights reserved

Developed & Designed by VS Infosolution