Home
GSC Advanced Research and Reviews
Peer-reviewed | Multidisciplinary Journal | Impact factor 8.3 | ISSN: 2582-4597 | Crossref DOI

Main navigation

  • Home
    • Journal Information
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Reviewer Panel
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Journal Policies
    • Our CrossMark Policy
    • Publication Ethics
    • Issue in Progress
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Article processing fee
    • Track Manuscript Status
    • Get Publication Certificate
    • Join Editorial Board
    • Join Reviewer Panel
  • Contact us
  • Downloads

Ultrasound findings in predicting difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • Ultrasound Findings In Predicting Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
  • Ultrasound findings in predicting difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Reem Abduljaleel Khaleel Al Thabit 1, *, Mohammed Abd Kadhim Aljuboory 2 and Sajid Hameed Al-Helfy 3

1 Radiologist /Iraqi ministry of health, Baghdad, Iraq.
2 Professor in diagnostic radiology, Medical College, AL-Nahrain university, Consultant radiologist in Al-Imamain Al-Kadhmayain medical city, Baghdad Iraq.
3 Professor in general surgery, Medical Collage, Al-Nahrain University, Consultant surgeon Al-Imamain Al-Kadhmayain medical city, Baghdad Iraq.
 
Research Article
GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 2024, 18(03), 173–181.
Article DOI: 10.30574/gscarr.2024.18.3.0098
DOI url: https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2024.18.3.0098
Received on 22 January 2024; revised on 02 March 2024; accepted on 04 March 2024
 
Background: Multiple technical intra-operative problems that raise the risk of complications and greatly lengthen the operating time are referred to as difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).
Aim: to assess preoperative ultrasound (US) findings that indicate a difficult (LC) and the potential benefits for improvement of patient care.
Patients and method:100 patients underwent LC over a period of 9 months. Of these, 74 were female and 26 were male. Abdominal US was performed 48 hours prior to the surgery. The gallbladder (GB) wall thickness, GB size, gallstone (GS) multiplicity, GS mobility, GB empyema, and presence of pericholecystic fluid are the six parameters that were examined by ultrasound. The surgical procedure was rated as easy or difficult based on some surgical parameters, these include the length of the procedure, the occurrence of intraoperative bleeding, and the presence of significant adhesions or inflammation surrounding the GB and the Calot's triangle that obscure the dissection planes. The results of the ultrasound and the operation were compared.
Results: According to the statistical analysis, all ultrasound parameters were significantly correlated with the degree of surgical difficulty. 21 of the patients had a difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy; of them, 2 had an open procedure performed because of severe adhesion. When predicting a difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the thick wall gallbladder > 3mm has the highest sensitivity (83.3%) and the presence of pericholecystic fluid or empyema has the highest specificity (100%).
Conclusion: preoperative ultrasound results can be useful in anticipating problems that may arise during LC and necessitate conversion to open cholecystectomy (OC).
 
Ultrasound; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Difficult; Open cholecystectomy.
 
https://gscarr.gsconlinepress.com/sites/default/files/fulltext_pdf/GSCARR-2024-…

Preview Article PDF

Reem Abduljaleel Khaleel Al Thabit, Mohammed Abd Kadhim Aljuboory and Sajid Hameed Al-Helfy. Ultrasound findings in predicting difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 2024, 18(3), 173-181. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2024.18.3.0098

Copyright © Author(s). All rights reserved. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.


All statements, opinions, and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s). The journal, editors, reviewers, and publisher disclaim any responsibility or liability for the content, including accuracy, completeness, or any consequences arising from its use.

Get Certificates

Get Publication Certificate

Download LoA

Check Corssref DOI details

Issue details

Issue Cover Page

Editorial Board

Table of content

Copyright © 2026 GSC Advanced Research and Reviews - All rights reserved

Developed & Designed by VS Infosolution